11/30/2022 - Analysis of yesterday's games according to Artificial Intelligence

Ecuador   1         

Senegal   2         

Ecuador had 40% of performance relative to a high performance team and Senegal had 25%.                

Relative intensity in the game:                       

        Ecuador: 61%

        Senegal: 39% 

Finishes:              

        Regular number of submissions in the game, 22.           

        Ecuador: had a regular number of submissions. The drive to goal rate was 50%, which is a good rate.        

        Senegal: had a good number of shots compared to a high performance team. Goal drive rate was 29% which is a bad rate       

        Who got the most successful finishes: Senegal-Pape Gueye, defensive midfielder, finishing twice.               

Disarms:                 

        Ecuador: neutralized 15% of the opponent's moves.        

        Senegal: neutralized 12% of the opponent's moves.         

        Senegal-Kalidou Koulibaly, defender and Ecuador-Félix Torres, defender were the ones who disarmed the most.        

Passes:           

        Ecuador: needs to evolve. Mistakes in passes can mean a defeat. Used 13% of long passes as resources.     

        Senegal needs to evolve. Mistakes in passes can mean a defeat. Used 21% of long passes as resources.       

        Ecuador-Piero Hincapié, defender was the one who hit the most passes.         

What to keep:           

        Ecuador: no high performance standouts.

        Senegal: no high performance standouts.

What to improve:                    

        Ecuador: pass success rate. 

        Senegal: pass success rate.

The tireless of the game were:                     

        Ecuador – Piero Hincapié, defender

        Ecuador - Felix Torres, defender

The best performances:             

        Piero Hincapié, ZAG of Ecuador

        Felix Torres, ZAG of Ecuador

        Ismail Jakobs, ZAG of Senegal

Worst performers:            

        Boulaye Dia, Senegal ATA

        Enner Valencia, Ecuador ATA

Qatar: 0

Netherlands: 2

Qatar had 35% of performance relative to a high performance team and Netherlands had 83%.         

Relative intensity in the game:            

        Qatar: 30%

        Netherlands: 70%

Finishes:  

        Regular number of finishes in the game, 17.

        Qatar: had a number of poor finishes. The goal-direction rate was 60%, which is an excellent rate.

        Netherlands: had a good number of submissions, comparing to a high performance team. The goal-direction rate was 42%, which is regular

        Most successful finishers: Qatar-Hassan Al Haydos, striker, finishing 1 time.

Disarms:      

        Qatar: neutralized 5% of the opponent's moves. Which is very little.

        Holland: neutralized 9% of the opponent's moves.

        Catar-Pedro Miguel, defender was the one who disarmed the most.

Passes:

        Qatar: had a high performance rate. Used 15% of long passes as resources, which could be strategy, but could also be escape.

        Holland had a high performance rate. Used 3% of long passes as resources.

        Holland-Jurrien Timber, defender was the one who hit the most passes.

What to keep:           

        Qatar: pass success rate.

        Netherlands: pass hit rate and intensity.

What to improve:        

        Qatar: number of submissions and tackling rate.

        Netherlands: number of submissions

The tireless of the game were:         

        Netherlands-Jurrien Timber, halfback

        Holland-Daley Blind, halfback

        Holland-Nathan Aké, defender

The best performances:  

        Jurrien Timber, ZAG of the Netherlands

        Nathan Aké, ZAG of the Netherlands

        Virgil van Dijk, ZAG of the Netherlands

Worst performance:     

        Memphis Depay, Netherlands ATA

United States: 1      

Iran: 0  

United States had 48% of performance relative to a high performance team and Iran had 42%.  

Relative intensity in the game:            

        United States: 53%

        Iran: 47%

Finishes:  

        Little number of submissions, 14.

        United States: had a good number of shots compared to a high performance team. The goal-direction rate was 45%, which is a good rate.

        Iran: had a number of bad finishes. Goal drive rate was 0% which is a very bad rate

        Who got the most successful submissions: United States-Christian Pulisic-MEI, submitting twice.

Disarms:      

        United States: Neutralized 10% of the opponent's moves.

        Iran: Neutralized 12% of the opponent's moves.

        United States-Tim Ream, defensive midfielder and United States-Cameron Carter-Vickers, defender were the ones that disarmed the most.

Passes:

        United States: had a good rate. Used 10% of long passes as resources.

        Iran: needs to evolve. Mistakes in passes can mean a defeat. Used 13% of long passes as resources.

        Iran-Morteza Pouraliganji, defender was the one who hit the most passes.

What to keep:           

        United States: no high performance standouts.

        Iran: Disarmament Fee.

What to improve:        

        United States: pass hit rate

        Iran: pass hit rate

The tireless of the game were:         

        United States-Tim Ream, steering wheel

        Iran-Majid Hosseini, defender

        Iran-Morteza Pouraliganji, defender

The best performances:  

        Cameron Carter-Vickers, US ZAG

        Tim Ream, US VOL

        Tyler Adams, US VOL

Worst performance:     

        Brenden Aaronson, US MEI

England: 3  

Wales: 0        

England had 66% performance relative to a high performance team and Wales had 29%.     

Relative intensity in the game:            

        England: 69%

        Wales: 31%

Finishes:  

        Good number of submissions in the match, 25.

        England: had an excellent number of finishes compared to a high performance team. The goal-direction rate was 47%, which is a good rate.

        Wales: had a regular number of finishes. Goal drive rate was 13% which is a bad rate

        Most successful finishers: England-Marcus Rashford, striker, finishing 4 times.

Disarms:      

        England: neutralized 9% of the opponent's plays.

        Wales: neutralized 7% of the opponent's plays, which is low.

        England-John Stones, defender and Wales-Ethan Ampadu, defender were the ones who disarmed the most.

Passes:

        England: had a high performance rate. Used 7% of long passes as resources.

        Wales: needs to evolve. Mistakes in passes can mean a defeat. Used 13% of long passes as resources.

        England-Harry Maguire, defender was the one who hit the most passes.

What to keep:           

        England: number of finishes

        Wales: no high performance stakes.

What to improve:        

        England: Tackle rate.

        Wales: Tackling rate and aiming on goal.

The tireless of the game were:         

        England-John Stones, defender

        England-Harry Maguire, halfback

        Wales-Chris Mepham, halfback

The best performances:  

        John Stones, England defender

        Harry Maguire, England defender

        Joe Rodon, Wales defender

Worst performance:     

        Brennan Johnson, Wales striker

Artificial Intelligence does not understand football, but it reveals patterns and important details for professionals, specialists and executives who want to identify key points for consistent improvement in their businesses.

One of the great advantages of AI is the capacity for in-depth analysis in real time, keeping the business in question at a high level of dynamism.

(*) FIF-AI: Football Intensity Factor, developed with the application of AI - Artificial Intelligence applied to football data generated from high-performance games and updated with continuous learning techniques.