.
World Cup - day 9
11/30/2022 - Analysis of yesterday's games according to Artificial Intelligence
Team Ranking – Best and Worst Performances in Two Rounds
Best Ball Performance Round 2
ZAG
Maya Yoshida, ZAG Japan
Jan Vertonghen, ZAG Belgium
LAT
Theo Hernandez, France LAT
Luke Shaw, England LAT
VOL
Axel Witsel, Belgium VOL
Frenkie de Jong, Netherlands VOL
MEI
In-beom Hwang, Korea Republic
MEI Bruno Fernandes, Portugal MEI
ATA
Salem Al Dawsari, ATA Saudi Arabia
Antoine Griezmann, ATA France
Brazil 1
Switzerland 0
Brazil had 61% performance relative to a champion team and Switzerland had 50%
Relative intensity in the game:
Brazil: 55%
Switzerland: 45%
Finishes:
Low number of finishes in the game, 15
Brazil: had a low number of shots compared to a champion team. The drive to goal rate was 50%, which is a good rate.
Switzerland: had a low number of shots compared to a champion team. Goal drive rate was 0% which is a very bad rate
tackles
Brazil: neutralized 11% of the opponent's plays
Switzerland: neutralized 10% of the opponent's moves
Manuel Akanji, defender from Switzerland and Alex Sandro, lateral from Brazil, were the ones who disarmed the most
Passes:
Brazil had a good rate. Using 8% of long passes as resources.
Switzerland had a good rate. Using 6% of long passes as resources.
Marquinhos, defender of Brazil, was the one who hit the most passes.
what to keep
Brazil: ability to neutralize opponents' shots.
Switzerland: no high performance standouts
what to improve
Brazil: intensity and finishes
Switzerland: intensity, finishing and goal-direction rate
The tireless of the game were:
Switzerland: Manuel Akanji-ZAG
Brazil: Marquinhos-ZAG
Brazil: Thiago Silva-ZAG
The best performances:
Marquinhos, ZAG do Brasil
Thiago Silva, ZAG do Brasil
Manuel Akanji, ZAG of Switzerland
Worst performance:
Richarlison, ATA do Brasil
Haris Seferovic, ATA Switzerland
Cameroon: 3
Serbia: 3
Cameroon had 31% performance relative to a high performance team and Serbia had 48%
Relative intensity in the game:
Shrimps: 40%
Serbia: 60%
Finishes:
Good number of submissions in the match, 26.
Cameroon: had low number of shots compared to a high performance team. The goal-direction rate was 64%, which is an excellent rate.
Serbia: had a low number of submissions, compared to a high-performance team. The goal-direction rate was 47%, which is a good rate.
The one who finished the most correctly was the Serbia striker, Aleksandar Mitrovic, finishing 3 times.
tackles
Cameroon: Neutralized only 7% of the opponent's plays
Serbia: neutralized, 12% of opponent's plays
Nikola Milenkovic, defender from Serbia, and Jean-Charles Castelletto, defender from Cameroon, were the ones who disarmed the most.
Passes:
Cameroon needs to evolve. Mistakes in passes can mean a defeat. Used 19% of long passes as a resource. Percentage well above average.
Serbia needs to evolve. Mistakes in passes can mean a defeat. Used 10% of long passes as a resource.
Serbia midfielder Sasa Lukic was the one who hit the most passes.
what to keep
Cameroon: there were no highlights of high performance
Serbia: there were no high performance highlights
what to improve
Cameroon: intensity
Serbia: intensity
The tireless of the game were:
Serbia-Dusan Tadic, striker
Serbia-Sasa Lukic, steering wheel
The best performances:
Nikola Milenkovic, Serbia defender
Jean-Charles Castelletto, defender from Cameroon
Worst performance:
Bryan Mbeumo, Cameroon midfielder
South Korea : 2
Ghana : 3
South Korea had 60% performance relative to a high performance team and Ghana had 30%
Relative intensity in the game:
South Korea: 66%
Ghana : 34%
Finishes:
Good number of submissions in the match, 23
South Korea: had a great number of submissions. The goal-direction rate was 33%, which is a bad rate.
Ghana: had low number of submissions, compared to a high performance team. The goal-direction rate was 60%, which is an excellent rate.
Most successful finishers: South Korea - Gue-sung Cho, striker who finished 4 times
Disarms:
South Korea : Neutralized 15% of opponent's plays Ghana : Neutralized 8% of opponent's plays
Ghana - Salisu Karim, defender was the one who most tackled
Passes:
South Korea had a high performance rate. Used 14% of long passes as resources.
Ghana had a good rate. Used 15% of long passes as resources.
South Korea-In-beom Hwang, midfielder, was the one who hit the most passes.
What to keep:
South Korea: number of submissions
Ghana: Direction hit rate in submissions
what to improve
South Korea: intensity
Ghana: intensity
The tireless of the game were:
South Korea-In-beom Hwang, midfielder
South Korea-Kim Moon-hwan, lateral
The best performances:
Min-jae Kim, defender from South Korea
Kim Moon-hwan, South Korea winger
In-beom Hwang, South Korea midfielder
Worst performance:
Iñaki Williams, Ghana striker
Woo-Yeong Jeong, South Korea midfielder
Portugal : 2
Uruguay : 0
Portugal had 62% of performance relative to a high performance team and Uruguay had 37%.
Relative intensity in the game:
Portugal : 62%
Uruguay : 38%
Finishes:
Good number of submissions in the match, 24
Portugal : had a good number of submissions, compared to a high performance team. Goal drive rate was 29% which is a bad rate
Uruguay : had a low number of shots, compared to a high performance team. The goal-direction rate was 40%, which is regular.
Bruno Fernandes, the Portugal midfielder who finished the match 4 times, had the most successful finishes.
tackles
Portugal : neutralized 11% of the opponent's plays
Uruguay : neutralized 9% of the opponent's plays
Uruguay-Sebastian Coates, defender and Portugal-Pepe, defender, were the ones who disarmed the most.
Passes:
Portugal had a good rate. Used 9% of long passes as resources.
Uruguay needs to evolve. Mistakes in passes can mean defeats. Used 11% of long passes as resources.
Portugal-Ruben Dias, defender was the one who hit the most passes.
What to keep:
Portugal: no high performance highlights
Uruguay: no high performance highlights
what to improve
Portugal: intensity
Uruguay: intensity
The tireless of the game were:
Uruguay-Rodrigo Bentancur, midfielder
Portugal-Bruno Fernandes, midfielder
Portugal-Ruben Dias, defender
The best performances:
Ruben Dias, Portugal defender
Bruno Fernandes, Portugal midfielder
Pepe, defender of Portugal
Worst performance:
Edinson Cavani, Uruguay striker
Darwin Nuñez, striker from Uruguay
Artificial Intelligence does not understand football, but it reveals patterns and important details for professionals, specialists and executives who want to identify key points for consistent improvement in their businesses.
One of the great advantages of AI is the capacity for in-depth analysis in real time, keeping the business in question at a high level of dynamism.
(*) FIF-AI: Football Intensity Factor, developed with the application of AI - Artificial Intelligence applied to football data generated from high-performance games and updated with continuous learning techniques.
About the author
Ricardo Villaça
Chief Artificial Intelligence OfficerRead too
Faster more accurate and efficient
The now Buzzing AI revolution in the financial sector
How new AI special agents can revolutionize the landscape of Fintechs and SMEs in the financial sector
A Copilot experience on what could be your new daily routine
Encontro com o Notável Eugenio Garcia
Nosso Associado Eugenio Garcia - diplomata técnico no consulado geral do Brasil em São Francisco, vice-cônsul geral e chefe de ciência, tecnologia e inovação, ponto focal para o Vale do