.
World Cup 2022 – Day 12
12/04/2022 - Analysis of yesterday's games according to Artificial Intelligence
Germany: 4
Costa Rica: 1
Germany had a 79% performance relative to a high performance team and Costa Rica had 33%
.
Relative intensity in the game:
Germany: 71%
Costa Rica: 29%
Finishes:
Excellent number of submissions in the match, 37.
Germany: had an excellent number of finishes compared to a high performance team. The goal-direction rate was 47%, which is a good rate.
Costa Rica: had a regular number of submissions. The goal-direction rate was 71%, which is an excellent rate.
Who scored the most goals: Germany-Jamal Musiala, midfielder, finishing 4 times.
Disarms:
Germany: neutralized 13% of the opponent's plays. Above average rate.
Costa Rica: neutralized 7% of the opponent's plays. Rate below average.
Costa Rica-Juan Vargas, defender and Costa Rica-Juan Vargas, defender were the ones who disarmed the most.
Passes:
Germany: had a high performance rate. Used 8% of long passes as resources.
Costa Rica: needs to evolve. Mistakes in passes can mean a defeat. Used 14% of long passes as resources.
Germany-Joshua Kimmich, defensive midfielder, was the one who hit the most passes.
What to keep:
Germany: intensity
Costa Rica: no high performance standouts
What to improve:
Germany: shots on goal rate
Costa Rica: intensity
The tireless of the game were:
Germany-Joshua Kimmich, steering wheel
Germany-Niklas Süle, defender
Germany-Antonio Rüdiger, defender
The best performances:
Niklas Süle, Germany defender
Joshua Kimmich, Germany midfielder
David Raum, Germany winger
Worst performance:
Roan Wilson, Costa Rica striker
Jewison Bennette, Costa Rica midfielder
Spain: 1
Japan: 2
Spain had super intensity relative to a high performance team and Japan had 20%.
Relative intensity in the game:
Spain: 84%
Japan: 16%
Finishes:
Regular number of finishes in the game, 19.
Spain: had a good number of finishes compared to a high performance team. The goal-direction rate was 38%, which is regular
Japan: had a number of poor finishes. The drive to goal rate was 50%, which is a good rate.
Who scored the most correct shots: Spain-Alvaro Morata, striker, finishing 3 times.
Disarms:
Spain: neutralized 18% of the opponent's moves. Above average rate.
Japan: Neutralized 4% of the opponent's moves. Rate below average.
Japan-Shogo Taniguchi, defender and Spain-Pau Torres, defender were the ones who disarmed the most.
Passes:
Spain: had a high performance rate. Used 4% of long passes as resources.
Japan: needs to evolve. Mistakes in passes can mean a defeat. Used 13% of long passes as resources.
Spain-Rodri, midfielder was the one who hit the most passes.
What to keep:
Spain: intensity
Japan: no high performance standouts
What to improve:
Spain: yesterday's game showed that despite the high intensity, there are flaws in Spain's game. It is worth noting that Japan used long passes and speed to try to surprise.
Japan: despite the victory, they played a low-intensity game
The tireless of the game were:
Spain-Pau Torres, defender
Spain-Rodri, steering wheel
Spain-Pedri, half
The best performances:
Rodri, Spain midfielder
Pau Torres, Spain defender
Pedri, Spain midfielder
Worst performance:
Takuma Asano, Japan striker
Canada: 0
Morocco: 2
Canada had 52% of performance relative to a high performance team and Morocco had 34%.
Relative intensity in the game:
Canada: 60%
Morocco: 40%
Finishes:
Little number of submissions, 11.
Canada: had a number of poor finishes. The goal driving rate was 20%, which is a bad rate.
Morocco: had a number of bad finishes. The goal-direction rate was 33%, which is a bad rate.
Disarms:
Canada: Neutralized 11% of the opponent's plays. Above average rate.
Morocco: neutralized 14% of the opponent's moves. Above average rate.
Morocco-Romain Saïss, defender and Morocco-Nayef Aguerd, defender were the ones who disarmed the most.
Passes:
Canada: had a high performance rate. Used 8% of long passes as resources.
Morocco: needs to evolve. Mistakes in passes can mean a defeat. Used 14% of long passes as resources.
Canada-Kamal Miller, defender was the one who hit the most passes.
What to keep:
Canada: no high performance standouts
Morocco: rate of tackles
What to improve:
Canada: intensity, finishes and rate of finishes
morocco: intensity
The tireless of the game were:
Canada-Kamal Miller, halfback
Canada-Steven Victoria, halfback
Canada-Alistair Johnston, midfielder
The best performances:
Kamal Miller, defender from Canada
Steven Victoria, Canada defender
Sofyan Amrabat, midfielder from Morocco
Worst performance:
Tajon Buchanan, forward from Canada
Cyle Larin, forward from Canada
Belgium: 0
Croatia: 0
Belgium had 66% of performance relative to a high performance team and Croatia had 58%.
Relative intensity in the game:
Belgium: 53%
Croatia: 47%
Finishes:
Good number of submissions in the match, 23.
Belgium: had a good number of finishes compared to a high performance team. The goal-direction rate was 23%, which is a bad rate.
Croatia: had a good number of finishes compared to a high performance team. The goal-direction rate was 40%, which is regular
Most successful finishers: Belgium-Romelu Lukaku, striker, finishing twice.
Disarms:
Belgium: neutralized 7% of the opponent's plays. Rate below average.
Croatia: neutralized 7% of the opponent's plays. Rate below average.
Belgium-Thomas Meunier, winger and Belgium-Toby Alderweireld, defender were the ones who disarmed the most.
Passes:
Belgium: had a high performance rate. Used 11% of long passes as resources.
Croatia: had a good rate. Used 9% of long passes as resources.
Belgium-Jan Vertonghen, defender was the one who hit the most passes.
What to keep:
Belgium: no high performance standouts
Croatia: no high performance standouts
What to improve:
Belgium: intensity
Croatia: intensity
The tireless of the game were:
Croatia-Borna Sosa, lateral
Belgium-Toby Alderweireld, defender
Belgium-Jan Vertonghen, defender
The best performances:
Jan Vertonghen, Belgium defender
Toby Alderweireld, Belgium defender
Josko Gvardiol, Croatia defender
Worst performance:
Marko Livaja, Croatia striker
Dries Mertens, Belgium striker
Artificial Intelligence does not understand football, but it reveals patterns and important details for professionals, specialists and executives who want to identify key points for consistent improvement in their businesses.
One of the great advantages of AI is the capacity for in-depth analysis in real time, keeping the business in question at a high level of dynamism.
(*) FIF-AI: Football Intensity Factor, developed with the application of AI - Artificial Intelligence applied to football data generated from high-performance games and updated with continuous learning techniques.
About the author
Ricardo Villaça
Chief Artificial Intelligence OfficerRead too
Faster more accurate and efficient
The now Buzzing AI revolution in the financial sector
How new AI special agents can revolutionize the landscape of Fintechs and SMEs in the financial sector
A Copilot experience on what could be your new daily routine
Encontro com o Notável Eugenio Garcia
Nosso Associado Eugenio Garcia - diplomata técnico no consulado geral do Brasil em São Francisco, vice-cônsul geral e chefe de ciência, tecnologia e inovação, ponto focal para o Vale do